// approach
You shouldn’t have to bet on a system that hasn’t proven itself on your parts. Our engagement is built so you can stop — or continue — at each step, with the numbers in front of you.
// working together
We look at the line itself: parts, defects, speed, lighting, constraints. Then we tell you whether vision or automation is the right answer, and roughly what it would take.
We prove the numbers on your parts and your defects before you commit to a full build. If it can’t hit the target, you find out early and cheaply — not after installation.
Design, build, install and commission the system on-site, validated against the acceptance criteria until it holds the numbers under real production.
After go-live we keep the system performing — monitoring, tuning, retraining models as your parts change, and extending it as the line evolves.
// how pricing works
We don’t quote a full system blind. The line assessment gives you an indicative budget range early. The proof-of-concept keeps the first real spend small and proves the numbers. Only then do you get a fixed-price proposal for the build — with the scope, the acceptance criteria and the schedule written down.
No hourly meter running in the background, no surprise change orders for work that was always going to be needed. If scope genuinely changes, we agree it before, not after.
// delivery
We look at the line itself: the parts, the defects, the throughput and the constraints. Then we tell you whether vision or automation is the right answer.
A concrete system architecture: sensors, lighting, compute, interfaces and acceptance criteria, with a fixed scope and price.
A proof-of-concept on your samples before you commit to a full build. If it can’t hit the numbers, you find out early and cheaply.
Development in short iterations you can see, with the hardware and software validated against the acceptance criteria.
Installation and tuning on-site, running against real production until it holds the numbers under real conditions.
Documentation, training for your staff, and a maintenance arrangement so the system keeps performing after handover.
// questions
You don’t have to take our word for it. Before any full build we run a proof-of-concept on your actual samples and measure it against acceptance criteria we agree up front. If it can’t hit the target, you know before you’ve committed to a system.
It depends on the line and the goal, so we don’t quote blind. The line assessment gives you an indicative range, and after a proof-of-concept you get a fixed-price proposal — no open-ended hourly surprises.
A line assessment is days. A proof-of-concept is typically a few weeks. A turnkey system depends on scope and hardware lead times; a concrete schedule is part of the proposal.
Yes. You own the deployed system and the production data it generates. We build on open, standard tools wherever possible so you are never locked to us to keep it running.
Not by default. Inference runs on-premises, at the edge, next to the machine. If you want cloud reporting or dashboards, that’s a choice you make — not something baked in.
Yes. Integration is the point. We connect to Siemens, Beckhoff and CODESYS control, and to your MES/ERP over OPC UA, MQTT and standard interfaces, rather than replacing what already works.
Both. Development and much of the engineering happen remotely; assessment and commissioning happen on-site. We’re based in Poland and work across the DACH region and the wider EU, in English, German and Polish.
// step one
The smallest possible first step. Tell us about the line and you’ll get a straight read on what’s possible, and what it would take.